By Ebi Perekeme
The lawmaker representing Ese-Odo Constituency in Ondo State House of Assembly, Barr. Success Torhukerhijo, has condemned the recent approval of the adoption of an indigenous anthem projecting only the culture and tradition of the Yoruba tribe by the State Executive Council.
The lawmaker representing the Ijaw-speaking communities in the state described the decision as “highly provocative and very irritating as it portends a deliberate affront to the peace-loving Ijaws of Ondo State.”
He alleged the governor of “running the Government of Ondo State without recourse to the pluralistic nature of the State.”
According to a statement made available to journalists in Akure, the state capital on Tuesday, Torhukerhijo said: “It is an incontrovertible fact that Ondo State has two ethnic nationalities viz the majority Yoruba and the minority Ijaw.
“It is therefore preposterous that the Governor could imagine adopting an anthem for the state in the Yoruba language without thinking of the concerns of the Ijaws. The Ijaw people consider this to be a ploy to obliterate them from the history of Ondo State. This is intolerable and is outrightly rejected by the Ijaw ethnic nationality.
“Akeredolu should tow the path of honour taken by his predecessors, particularly the doyen of the politics of progressivism in Ondo State, Chief Michael Adekunle Ajasin, who in recognition of the existence of the Ijaws in Ondo State created a Subordinate Area Council which enjoyed almost equal status with other Local Governments in the State in 1981. Not only this, Governor Ajasin ensured that the Ijaw news and programmes were aired on the State Radio and Television.”
The lawmaker alleged the governor of flagrantly disregarding constitutional provisions to deliberately plot the extermination of the Ijaws of Ondo State through draconian laws and questionable executive actions.
Buttressing his claim, Torhukerhijo referred to Section 42 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) states that:
“A citizen of Nigeria of a particular Community, ethnic group, place of origin, sex, religion or political opinion shall not by reason only that he is such a person(s) be subjected either expressly by, or in practical application of, any law in force in Nigeria or any executive or administrative action of the government, to disabilities or restriction to which citizens of Nigeria of other communities, ethnic groups, places of origin, sex, religion or political opinions are not made subject or (b) be accorded either expressly by, or in practical application of, any law in force in Nigeria or any such executive or administrative action, any privilege or advantage that is not accorded to citizens of Nigeria of other communities, ethnic groups and places of origin, sex, religions, or political opinions.”
“A citizen of Nigeria of a particular Community, ethnic group, place of origin, sex, religion or political opinion shall not by reason only that he is such a person(s) be subjected either expressly by, or in practical application of, any law in force in Nigeria or any executive or administrative action of the government, to disabilities or restriction to which citizens of Nigeria of other communities, ethnic groups, places of origin, sex, religion or political opinions are not made subject or (b) be accorded either expressly by, or in practical application of, any law in force in Nigeria or any such executive or administrative action, any privilege or advantage that is not accorded to citizens of Nigeria of other communities, ethnic groups and places of origin, sex, religions, or political opinions.”





